The five figure types are used extensively throughout PMA’s FD ~ CS series of publications, where they are represented by letters of the alphabet. Each figure type is colour coded for easy identification.
The averaged body measurements, specific for each figure type, are used for the steps and procedures for drafting each master block in Units 2 to 11. A full range of averaged body measurements for all five figure types is included.
As you have no doubt gathered by now, PMA is about body size and shape as opposed to garment size. And here is the key reason:- the reality today, that female body size and shape has changed significantly over the last five decades, has had a major impact on the fit of female garments – particularly those intended for the “Ready-to-Wear” industry, where traditional sizing systems are still predominant.
Evidence suggests, that body shape variation is yet to be uniformly accepted by many brands, retailers, designers or manufacturers, and even customers.
The table and pie chart below show the population percentages of each figure type. It is notable that Figure Type H represents the highest percentage. This result is supported by the World Health Organisation [WHO] in relation to the rise in weight issues throughout the world.
The table also shows that the five different figure types accounted for around 98% of the sample population.


It stands to reason that when figure type percentages such as this are reliably categorized, body shape variation must be a major consideration for the sizing and production of well-fitting garments.
Numerous research and studies conducted overseas support the finding, that female body shape has changed substantially over the past five decades. I believe this finding is a major contributing factor for poorly fitting female garments – and the consumer and retailer frustration that results.
Unit 12 explores the sizing “dilemma” in more detail, and includes opinions and suggestions made by various industry commentators.
